• Texte

    A recent success will have a significant impact on the journal's trajectory

    RI/IR has recently recieved the highest grant of it history. Pr. Gould, the journal's editor, details the tremendous impact this will have on our ambitious reform program.

  • texte

    RI/IR has increased its ranking!

    One of the most prestigious journal ranking list has increased the journal's ranking. Read Pr. Gould reaction to the news.

Les dimensions conceptuelles du leadership et les styles qui en découlent

Les dimensions conceptuelles du leadership et les styles qui en découlent

Jean-Louis Bergeron

Volume : 34-1 (1979)

Abstract

The Conceptual Dimensions of Leadership and the Leadership Styles which are Derived from Them

Following a definition of leadership, the author distinguishes between a dimension of leadership (a continuum of activities which belong to a sameconcept and represent different levels of that concept) and a leadership style (a particular level on a dimension or a particular way of combining several dimensions). The work of several authors who have researched or discussed the dimensions of leadership is then reviewed in some detail: Fleishman, Hams, and Burtt; Kahn; Kahn and Katz; Cartwright and Zander; Likert; Bowers and Seashore ; Yukl ; Bass and Valenzi ; House. On the basis of this review of the literature, the author argues that leadership behavior should be studied under five dimensions which are described at some length: direction and structure, emphasis on excellence, human relations, participation, emphasis on teamwork.

The second part of the article deals with leadership styles. In reviewing a number of important authors in this area (White and Lippitt ; Tannenbaum and Schmidt; Blake and Mouton; Reddin; Fiedler; Halal), an attempt is made to discover and to make more explicit the dimensions which underlie the various styles described in this literature. Some authors appear to be using only one dimension (Tannenbaum and Schmidt; Fiedler), while others use two or more.

In his concluding remarks, the author discusses two points: the distinction between conceptual vs operational dimensions of leadership and the usefulness of dimensions vs styles of leadership in management development efforts.