• mockupRIIR

    Volume 78-3 is online!

    RI/IR is an open access journal. Enjoy your reading!

  • New associate editors

    New associate editors

    Welcome to our new associate editors : Professor Tania Saba, Professor Ernesto Noronha, Professor Ann Frost and Professor Jean-Étienne Joullié!

  • Campus Hiver

    RIIR in one minute

    Watch this short video that introduce the journal, its recent accomplishments and our future ambitions!

Concilier vie familiale et vie professionnelle en France : les disparités d’horaires de travail

Concilier vie familiale et vie professionnelle en France : les disparités d’horaires de travail

Anne Bustreel, Frédérique Cornuau et Martine Pernod-Lemattre

Volume : 67-4 (2012)

Abstract

Family-friendly Working Time Arrangements: The Case of France

In France, labour market flexibility continues to be one of the key issues in labour market reform. These changes occur in a labour market characterized by a high level of mothers’ participation rate. Flexibility based on working time and work schedules could result in a worsening of work-life balance conditions. How do women, and mothers, cope with these new temporal constraints? Do they manage to get family-friendly working time arrangements? This paper uses the first French survey on work-life balance (“Families and Employers”) to develop a typology of working time arrangements. The classification is based on a set of variables describing the duration and the scheduling of work with special attention given to the employee’s access to flexibility. The results show that women are over-represented in the most flexible category, but also in the least flexible category. Children have apparently no effect.

The paper tests three explanations of why working time arrangements could differ by gender: preferences for convenient work schedules, production constraints specific to occupations and/or industries, and bargaining power of workers. Being a woman increases the likelihood of having a “super-flexible” work schedule and decreases the probability of having “shifted-inflexible” or “long-flexible” schedules. Preferences for convenient schedules turn out to play no role while production constraints and bargaining power exert significant effects and explain why women are over-represented in “fragmented-inflexible” working time arrangements.

Keywords: flexibility, working schedules, work-life balance, France